Java: Printf-style format strings should be used correctly, logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result " + param, exception); // Noncompliant; Lambda should be used to differ string concatenation. org.slf4j.Logger slf4jLog SonarQube is raising an issue on my string formatter use: Format specifiers should be used instead of string concatenation. I have used below java code to add padding 0 in the number. int paddingLength = seqLength - seqNoLength; String.format("%0" + paddingLength + "d", seqNo);
Java: "Preconditions" and logging arguments should not require , Specifically, the built-in string formatting should be used instead of string concatenation, and if the message is the result of a method call, then Preconditions jimzucker changed the title Sonar Critical: Format specifiers should be used instead of string concatenation. Sonar Critical: Printf-style format strings should not lead to unexpected behavior at runtime 1 Mar 21, 2016
SonarQube issue raised on use of string formatter, Format specifiers should be used instead of string concatenation. I have used below java code to add padding 0 in the number. int Also, if you use enough format specifiers, you might end up with a stack pointer that points to user-controllable input, like the format string itself. From here, it gets worse.
it seems that a new rule is available with latest version. I have several issue reported as "Printf-style format strings should be used correctly (squid:S3457)" I don't understand the description and what is wrong in my case: LOGGER.info("Checking for client process pid: {0}", parentProcessId); // issue: String contains no format specifiers
RSPEC-3941 Printf-style format strings should be used correctly. Closed; Printf-style format strings should be used correctly. Closed; SONARPY-685 Rule S3457:
As per SonarLint Report, Printf-style format strings should be used correctly (squid:S3457) Because printf-style format strings are interpreted at runtime,
printf_s, _printf_s_l, wprintf_s, _wprintf_s_l, writes output to stdout rather than to a destination of type FILE. The memory-writing conversion specifier % n is a common target of security exploits where format strings depend on user input and is not supported by the bounds-checked printf_s family of functions. There is a sequence point after the action of each conversion specifier; this permits storing multiple % n results in the same variable or, as an
What's the difference between printf and printf_s in C?, I learned something new today. I've never used the _s functions and always assumed they were vendor-supplied extensions, but they are printf vs fprintf: printf is a C function to print a formatted string to the standard output stream which is the computer screen. fprintf is a C function to print a formatted string to a file. Syntax: Formatted string and list of parameters are passed to printf function. e.g. printf(“format”, args);
printf, fprintf, sprintf, snprintf, printf_s, fprintf_s, sprintf_s, snprintf_s , The main difference between printf_sand printf is that printf_s checks the format string for valid formatting characters, whereas printf only checks if the format People often claim that printf is much faster. This is largely a myth. I just tested it, with the following results: cout with only endl 1461.310252 ms cout with only ' ' 343.080217 ms printf with only ' ' 90.295948 ms cout with string constant and endl 1892.975381 ms cout with string constant and ' ' 416.123446 ms printf with string constant and ' ' 472.073070 ms cout with some stuff and
Format Specification Syntax: printf and wprintf Functions, The printf function formats and prints a series of characters and values to This change only affects programs built using Visual Studio 2019 For POSIX-systems with large file support, CURL_FORMAT_OFF_T will be %lld. This makes it easier for app coders to printf() the variables using non-curl printf()s and it will stop compilers from warning on our custom %Od stuff. The curl printf code supports %lld, and I'd want it to support the MSVC way too
printf, _printf_l, wprintf, _wprintf_l, By popular request, in Visual Studio 2015 RTM, we've implemented the checking of arguments given to printf/scanf and their variations in the C printf() Parameters. format: Pointer to a null terminated string that is written to the file stream. It consists of characters along with optional format specifiers starting with %. The format specifiers are replaced by the values of respective variables that follows the format string. The format specifier has the following parts: A leading % sign
Format Specifiers Checking, The DataTip display reflects the format specifier. Note. When the Visual Studio native debugger changed to a new debugging engine, some new With GCC, I can specify __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2))) , telling the compiler that this function takes vararg parameters that are printf format specifiers. This is very helpful in the cases
Logger slf4j advantages of formatting with {} instead of string , It is about string concatenation performance. It's potentially significant if your have dense logging statements. (Prior to SLF4J 1.7) But only two Unused string concatenation (i.e. debugging statements) should be avoided. Do use either the (overly verbose but efficient) log-level check or the (slimmer, but perhaps minor overhead) object array parameter. (I'd prefer the latter, all things being equal.) It's hard to say that the string concat's won't be important/won't impact performance.
Java: Printf-style format strings should be used correctly, format specifiers should be used instead of string concatenation sonar logger Why use SLF4J over Log4J for logging in Java, Is there any advantage of using Also, if you use enough format specifiers, you might end up with a stack pointer that points to user-controllable input, like the format string itself. From here, it gets worse.
Slf4j Format String Example, Because printf -style format strings are interpreted at runtime, rather than validated by the String contains no format specifiers. logger.log(java.util.logging.Level Noncompliant; Lambda should be used to differ string concatenation. org.slf4j. There’s three common methods of creating a String with the appropriate user ID in place, namely direct string concatenation, using a StringBuilder, or using String.format. I personally find using the String.format method to be the cleanest and tend to use it when applicable, but I recently began wondering how it actually performs against the
Sonarqube, "String contains no format specifiers" when logging , This is a known issue introduced with SonarJava 5.1. You can safely consider this issue as a False Positive (FP) and/or ignore it. It has already This is a known issue introduced with SonarJava 5.1. You can safely consider this issue as a False Positive (FP) and/or ignore it. It has already been fixed while handling JIRA ticket SONARJAVA-2633.
Java confusing: Printf-style format strings should be used correctly, logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result '{0}'", 14); // Noncompliant - String contains no format specifiers. logger.log(java. Standard numeric format strings are used to format common numeric types. A standard numeric format string takes the form Axx, where: A is a single alphabetic character called the format specifier. Any numeric format string that contains more than one alphabetic character, including white space, is interpreted as a custom numeric format string.
S3457: "String contains no format specifiers" incorrectly works with , public void error(String format, Object arguments);. which indeed has format as the first argument. Same thing with all other Logger methods: When iterating over a format if any format specifier is encountered it is understood by the compiler/interpreter that there exists a corresponding directive whose value is to be formatted and used. Hence, a string may contain no format specifier at all, but if it does at least the same number of directives should be resent as well.
The answers/resolutions are collected from stackoverflow, are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license.